Plato's Use of Phaedo

The dialogue of Phaedo, to me, is a masterpiece because of the way Plato utilized his characters. Plato states that he was not present during Socrates final hours which makes me wonder, why did he choose to speak on Socrates behalf? I presume that this dialogue is actually Plato's interpretation of Phaedo's recollection of the discussion between Socrates, Crito, Simmias, Cebes, and himself. Are the argument's used by the figure of Socrates formulated by Plato? I think Plato was trying to find a way to cope with Socrates decision to drink the  Hemlock without hesitation. Maybe Plato theorized that Socrates was more than just a body and that his soul must live on. The Socrates portrayed in Phaedo claimed that only a true philosopher, one who is courageous and brave, will embrace death because only the body will die. Dying is the opposite of living thus living is the opposite of dying and you cannot have one without the other. Is is possible for someone to fully accept that in order to live death must follow or fair to assume that only a true philosopher does so? This is ironic to me because Plato is said to have been devastated by Socrates death.

Comments

  1. Rose_MFebruary 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM

    If we consider Plato as a writer, he may have used the opportunity in writing Phaedo to discuss topics that perplexed him. I agree with you that it may be a coping mechanism, however, it was a while after Socrates death that Plato started to write the dialogues, so he may have been using Phaedo to think about why someone would not fear death not why his friend chose to die. I feel as though Plato knew Socrates well and knew that that would have been his choice all along. As we read in Crito Socrates had a chance to live longer and chose not to flee.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Matt SillimanFebruary 5, 2017 at 5:12 PM

    Be careful of assuming that the character Socrates speaks for Plato. I like Rose's formulation that he used the opportunity to discuss topics that perplexed him. Neither Plato nor the historical Socrates may actually have agreed with the very strange arguments we see here -- the point is the exploration itself, and the sunousia it entails.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plato's Socrates

I am intrigued by how beautiful Plato made Socrates. Plato did say that the Socrates in his dialogues was made out to be young and beautiful. Why does Plato create an opposite of his historically ugly and elderly mentor? I think that Plato understood societies shallow misconception of true beauty. Plato used a rhetoric that painted an ideal picture for his audience which captured their attention. This image gave Plato an opportunity to educate on some of Socrates most complex philosophical theories. The arguments throughout the dialogues thus far, both the good and the bad, have nevertheless given Socrates a God-like image. If only everyone could be as calm about drinking Hemlock as Socrates...
Read more

Ambiguity

Ambiguity seemed like a hot-button topic during last Monday's class. The ambiguity of teaching seems to come from an individual's ability to perceive concepts differently depending on who their teacher is and what is being taught. Plato's character, Socrates, seems to avoid the ambiguity of difficult concepts such as justice and virtue by attempting to speak the language of the discourse community that surrounds him. Plato provides Socrates with literary tools that allow his audience to use personal experiences as a basis for the concepts they are attempting to define. I made the analogy for teaching virtue (or concepts such as love, friendship, etc.) as teaching a language in Monday's class because although one can be taught how to spell a word, I believe that only through practice and experience can one learn how to apply it.
Read more